@article{2982842,
    title = "Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies",
    author = "Wu, Y. and Levis, B. and Sun, Y. and Krishnan, A. and He, C. and Riehm, K.E. and Rice, D.B. and Azar, M. and Yan, X.W. and Neupane, D. and Bhandari, P.M. and Imran, M. and Chiovitti, M.J. and Saadat, N. and Boruff, J.T. and Cuijpers, P. and Gilbody, S. and McMillan, D. and Ioannidis, J.P.A. and Kloda, L.A. and Patten, S.B. and Shrier, I. and Ziegelstein, R.C. and Henry, M. and Ismail, Z. and Loiselle, C.G. and Mitchell, N.D. and Tonelli, M. and Al-Adawi, S. and Beraldi, A. and Braeken, A.P.B.M. and Büel-Drabe, N. and Bunevicius, A. and Carter, G. and Chen, C.-K. and Cheung, G. and Clover, K. and Conroy, R.M. and Cukor, D. and da Rocha e Silva, C.E. and Dabscheck, E. and Daray, F.M. and Douven, E. and Downing, M.G. and Feinstein, A. and Ferentinos, P.P. and Fischer, F.H. and Flint, A.J. and Fujimori, M. and Gallagher, P. and Gandy, M. and Goebel, S. and Grassi, L. and Härter, M. and Jenewein, J. and Jetté, N. and Julião, M. and Kim, J.-M. and Kim, S.-W. and Kjærgaard, M. and Köhler, S. and Loosman, W.L. and Löwe, B. and Martin-Santos, R. and Massardo, L. and Matsuoka, Y. and Mehnert, A. and Michopoulos, I. and Misery, L. and Navines, R. and O'Donnell, M.L. and Öztürk, A. and Peceliuniene, J. and Pintor, L. and Ponsford, J.L. and Quinn, T.J. and Reme, S.E. and Reuter, K. and Rooney, A.G. and Sánchez-González, R. and Schwarzbold, M.L. and Senturk Cankorur, V. and Shaaban, J. and Sharpe, L. and Sharpe, M. and Simard, S. and Singer, S. and Stafford, L. and Stone, J. and Sultan, S. and Teixeira, A.L. and Tiringer, I. and Turner, A. and Walker, J. and Walterfang, M. and Wang, L.-J. and White, J. and Wong, D.K. and Benedetti, A. and Thombs, B.D.",
    journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
    year = "2020",
    volume = "129",
    publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA",
    issn = "0022-3999",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109892",
    keywords = "Article;  comparative study;  Composite International Diagnostic Interview;  diagnostic accuracy;  disease classification;  Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale;  human;  major depression;  meta analysis (topic);  mini international neuropsychiatric interview;  semi structured interview;  Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders;  female;  major depression;  male;  meta analysis;  probability;  psychological rating scale, Depressive Disorder, Major;  Female;  Humans;  Male;  Probability;  Psychiatric Status Rating Scales",
    abstract = "Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Methods: Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores. Results: There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)). Conclusion: Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity. © 2019 Elsevier Inc."
}