@article{3081168,
    title = "Informed consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A 2002 ESGE survey",
    author = "Triantafyllou, K and Stanciu, C and Kruse, A and Malfertheiner, P and and Axon, A and Ladas, SD",
    journal = "Digestive Diseases",
    year = "2002",
    volume = "20",
    number = "3-4",
    pages = "280-283",
    publisher = "Karger",
    issn = "0257-2753, 1421-9875",
    doi = "10.1159/000067681",
    keywords = "informed consent; gastroenterology; endoscopy; European Society of
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy law; information; documentation",
    abstract = "Background/Aim: Gastroenterologists are required to obtain informed
consent before undertaking any endoscopic examination. Published data
indicate that in practice there are many deficiencies in this process.
The aim of this survey was to determine the quality of information given
to patients before the endoscopic procedures in countries that are
members of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE).
Methods: A structured questionnaire was sent to representatives of
endoscopic societies that are members of ESGE regarding the quality of
informed consent. Results: The response rate was 59% (26/44). The
endoscopist is responsible for giving the required information prior to
written consent in only 23.1% (6/26) of the countries. Although
information about the procedure is given to the patients in 96% of the
responding countries, in only 77% is there sufficient time for the
patients to ask questions about the nature of the procedure. In 15%
(4/26) of the countries neither the diagnostic or therapeutic
alternatives to endoscopy are discussed nor the potential complication
rates. Finally, the procedure-related mortality is provided in only 23%
(6/26) of countries. Conclusion: The procedure of obtaining informed
consent for endoscopy varies considerably and may need reevaluation.
Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel."
}