@article{3084896, title = "Bleeding duodenal ulcer: comparison between Helicobacter pylori positive and Helicobacter pylori negative bleeders", author = "Adamopoulos, AB and Efstathiou, SP and Tsioulos, DI and Tzamouranis, DG and and Tsiakou, AG and Tiniakos, D and Mountokalakis, TD", journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease", year = "2004", volume = "36", number = "1", pages = "13-20", publisher = "EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC", issn = "1590-8658", doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2003.09.017", keywords = "H. pylori infection; peptic ulcer; upper gastrointestinal bleeding", abstract = "Background and aims. To provide a direct comparison of Helicobacter pylori-positive subjects bleeding from duodenal ulcer with H. pylori-negative ones, in terms of severity of bleeding and outcome. Patients and methods. A case-control study was prospectively conducted in 105 H. pylori-negative duodenal ulcer bleeders and same number of sex- and age-matched H. pylori-positive ones. Results. NSAID consumption was more common among H. pylori-negative subjects (81%) compared to their H. pylori-positive counterparts (58.1%, P < 0.001). H. pylori-negative bleeders were found to need more often haemostasis (55.2% versus 31.4%, P < 0.001) or surgical intervention (15.2% versus 4.8%, P = 0.011) and to have a greater proportion of rebleeding (32.4% versus 13.3%, P = 0.001), a more prolonged hospitalisation (11.6 +/- 4.1 versus 6.2 +/- 1.5 days, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of in-hospital mortality (15.2% versus 3.8%, P = 0.005). In the overall population (N = 210), H. pylori negativity, among other known risk factors, emerged as independent predictor (odds ratio: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 11.2; P = 0.004) of an unfavourable outcome (surgery or death). Conclusions. Duodenal ulcer bleeding in H. pylori-negative subjects appears to be more severe, to have a higher rate of rebleeding, and to lead more often to surgery or fatality compared to the vast majority of H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer bleeders. (C) 2003 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved." }