@article{3185746,
    title = "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability
using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in
pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis",
    author = "Levis, Brooke and McMillan, Dean and Sun, Ying and He, Chen and Rice, and Danielle B. and Krishnan, Ankur and Wu, Yin and Azar, Marleine and and Sanchez, Tatiana A. and Chiovitti, Matthew J. and Bhandari, Parash Mani and and Neupane, Dipika and Saadat, Nazanin and Riehm, Kira E. and Imran, and Mahrukh and Boruff, Jill T. and Cuijpers, Pim and Gilbody, Simon and and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Kloda, Lorie A. and Patten, Scott B. and and Shrier, Ian and Ziegelstein, Roy C. and Comeau, Liane and Mitchell, and Nicholas D. and Tonelli, Marcello and Vigod, Simone N. and Aceti, Franca and and Alvarado, Ruben and Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme and Bakare, Muideen O. and and Barnes, Jacqueline and Tatano Beck, Cheryl and Bindt, Carola and and Boyce, Philip M. and Bunevicius, Adomas and Castro e Couto, Tiago and and Chaudron, Linda H. and Correa, Humberto and de Figueiredo, Felipe and Pinheiro and Eapen, Valsamma and Fernandes, Michelle and Figueiredo, and Barbara and Fisher, Jane R. W. and Garcia-Esteve, Lluisa and and Giardinelli, Lisa and Helle, Nadine and Howard, Louise M. and Khalifa, and Dina Sami and Kohlhoff, Jane and Kusminskas, Laima and Kozinszky, Zoltan and and Lelli, Lorenzo and Leonardou, Angeliki A. and Lewis, Beth A. and and Maes, Michael and Meuti, Valentina and Rados, Sandra Nakic and Navarro and Garcia, Purificacion and Nishi, Daisuke and E-Andjafono, Daniel Okitundu and Luwa and Robertson-Blackmore, Emma and Rochat, Tamsen J. and Rowe, and Heather J. and Siu, Bonnie W. M. and Skalkidou, Alkistis and Stein, Alan and and Stewart, Robert C. and Su, Kuan-Pin and Sundstroem-Poromaa, Inger and and Tadinac, Meri and Tandon, S. Darius and Tendais, Iva and Thiagayson, and Pavaani and Toereki, Annamaria and Torres-Gimenez, Anna and Tran, Thach and D. and Trevillion, Kylee and Turner, Katherine and Vega-Dienstmaier, and Johann M. and Wynter, Karen and Yonkers, Kimberly A. and Benedetti, and Andrea and Thombs, Brett D.",
    journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",
    year = "2019",
    volume = "28",
    number = "4",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    issn = "1049-8931, 1557-0657",
    doi = "10.1002/mpr.1803",
    keywords = "depressive disorders; diagnostic interviews; Edinburgh Postnatal
Depression Scale; individual participant data meta-analysis; major
depression",
    abstract = "Objectives A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA)
identified differences in major depression classification rates between
different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on
the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine
whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using
studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
(EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods Data accrued for an EPDS
diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear
mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite
International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant
characteristics. Results Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15
studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified
depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194
major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95%
confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the
semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major
depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI
[0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92,
0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion Different
interviews may not classify major depression equivalently."
}