TY - JOUR
TI - Probability of major depression diagnostic classification based on the SCID, CIDI and MINI diagnostic interviews controlling for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression subscale scores: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 73 primary studies
AU - Wu, Y.
AU - Levis, B.
AU - Sun, Y.
AU - Krishnan, A.
AU - He, C.
AU - Riehm, K.E.
AU - Rice, D.B.
AU - Azar, M.
AU - Yan, X.W.
AU - Neupane, D.
AU - Bhandari, P.M.
AU - Imran, M.
AU - Chiovitti, M.J.
AU - Saadat, N.
AU - Boruff, J.T.
AU - Cuijpers, P.
AU - Gilbody, S.
AU - McMillan, D.
AU - Ioannidis, J.P.A.
AU - Kloda, L.A.
AU - Patten, S.B.
AU - Shrier, I.
AU - Ziegelstein, R.C.
AU - Henry, M.
AU - Ismail, Z.
AU - Loiselle, C.G.
AU - Mitchell, N.D.
AU - Tonelli, M.
AU - Al-Adawi, S.
AU - Beraldi, A.
AU - Braeken, A.P.B.M.
AU - Büel-Drabe, N.
AU - Bunevicius, A.
AU - Carter, G.
AU - Chen, C.-K.
AU - Cheung, G.
AU - Clover, K.
AU - Conroy, R.M.
AU - Cukor, D.
AU - da Rocha e Silva, C.E.
AU - Dabscheck, E.
AU - Daray, F.M.
AU - Douven, E.
AU - Downing, M.G.
AU - Feinstein, A.
AU - Ferentinos, P.P.
AU - Fischer, F.H.
AU - Flint, A.J.
AU - Fujimori, M.
AU - Gallagher, P.
AU - Gandy, M.
AU - Goebel, S.
AU - Grassi, L.
AU - Härter, M.
AU - Jenewein, J.
AU - Jetté, N.
AU - Julião, M.
AU - Kim, J.-M.
AU - Kim, S.-W.
AU - Kjærgaard, M.
AU - Köhler, S.
AU - Loosman, W.L.
AU - Löwe, B.
AU - Martin-Santos, R.
AU - Massardo, L.
AU - Matsuoka, Y.
AU - Mehnert, A.
AU - Michopoulos, I.
AU - Misery, L.
AU - Navines, R.
AU - O'Donnell, M.L.
AU - Öztürk, A.
AU - Peceliuniene, J.
AU - Pintor, L.
AU - Ponsford, J.L.
AU - Quinn, T.J.
AU - Reme, S.E.
AU - Reuter, K.
AU - Rooney, A.G.
AU - Sánchez-González, R.
AU - Schwarzbold, M.L.
AU - Senturk Cankorur, V.
AU - Shaaban, J.
AU - Sharpe, L.
AU - Sharpe, M.
AU - Simard, S.
AU - Singer, S.
AU - Stafford, L.
AU - Stone, J.
AU - Sultan, S.
AU - Teixeira, A.L.
AU - Tiringer, I.
AU - Turner, A.
AU - Walker, J.
AU - Walterfang, M.
AU - Wang, L.-J.
AU - White, J.
AU - Wong, D.K.
AU - Benedetti, A.
AU - Thombs, B.D.
JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research
PY - 2020
VL - 129
TODO - null
SP - null
PB - ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, NY 10010-1710 USA
SN - 0022-3999
TODO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109892
TODO - Article;  comparative study;  Composite International Diagnostic Interview;  diagnostic accuracy;  disease classification;  Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale;  human;  major depression;  meta analysis (topic);  mini international neuropsychiatric interview;  semi structured interview;  Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders;  female;  major depression;  male;  meta analysis;  probability;  psychological rating scale, Depressive Disorder, Major;  Female;  Humans;  Male;  Probability;  Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
TODO - Objective: Two previous individual participant data meta-analyses (IPDMAs) found that different diagnostic interviews classify different proportions of people as having major depression overall or by symptom levels. We compared the odds of major depression classification across diagnostic interviews among studies that administered the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Methods: Data accrued for an IPDMA on HADS-D diagnostic accuracy were analysed. We fit binomial generalized linear mixed models to compare odds of major depression classification for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), controlling for HADS-D scores and participant characteristics with and without an interaction term between interview and HADS-D scores. Results: There were 15,856 participants (1942 [12%] with major depression) from 73 studies, including 15,335 (97%) non-psychiatric medical patients, 164 (1%) partners of medical patients, and 357 (2%) healthy adults. The MINI (27 studies, 7345 participants, 1066 major depression cases) classified participants as having major depression more often than the CIDI (10 studies, 3023 participants, 269 cases) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.70 (0.84, 3.43)) and the semi-structured SCID (36 studies, 5488 participants, 607 cases) (aOR = 1.52 (1.01, 2.30)). The odds ratio for major depression classification with the CIDI was less likely to increase as HADS-D scores increased than for the SCID (interaction aOR = 0.92 (0.88, 0.96)). Conclusion: Compared to the SCID, the MINI may diagnose more participants as having major depression, and the CIDI may be less responsive to symptom severity. © 2019 Elsevier Inc.
ER -