TY - JOUR
TI - A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rituximab in patients with stiff person syndrome
AU - Dalakas, M.C.
AU - Rakocevic, G.
AU - Dambrosia, J.M.
AU - Alexopoulos, H.
AU - McElroy, B.
JO - Annals of Neurology
PY - 2017
VL - 82
TODO - 2
SP - 271-277
PB - John Wiley and Sons Inc
SN - 0364-5134, 1531-8249
TODO - 10.1002/ana.25002
TODO - autoantibody;  glutamate decarboxylase;  immunologic factor;  rituximab, blood;  controlled study;  double blind procedure;  female;  human;  immunology;  male;  middle aged;  randomized controlled trial;  Stiff-Person Syndrome;  treatment outcome, Autoantibodies;  Double-Blind Method;  Female;  Glutamate Decarboxylase;  Humans;  Immunologic Factors;  Male;  Middle Aged;  Rituximab;  Stiff-Person Syndrome;  Treatment Outcome
TODO - Objective: In stiff person syndrome (SPS), an antibody-mediated impaired γ-aminobutyric acidergic (GABAergic) neurotransmission is believed to cause muscle stiffness and spasms. Most patients improve with GABA-enhancing drugs and intravenous immunoglobulin, but some respond poorly and remain disabled. The need for more effective therapy prompted a trial with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. Methods: This was a placebo-controlled randomized trial of rituximab (2 biweekly infusions of 1g each). The primary outcome was a change in stiffness scores at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in heightened-sensitivity and quality of life scores. Enrolling 24 patients was calculated to detect 50% change in stiffness scores. Results: Randomization was balanced for age, sex, disease duration, and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody titers. No significant changes were noted at 6 months after treatment in all outcomes. Specifically, no differences were noted in the stiffness index, the primary outcome, or sensitivity scores, the secondary outcome, at 3 or 6 months. Quality of life scores improved significantly (p < 0.01) at 3 months in both groups, but not at 6 months, denoting an early placebo effect. Blinded self-assessment rating of the overall stiffness for individual patients revealed improvement in 4 patients in each group. At 6 months, improvement persisted in 1 patient in the placebo group versus 3 of 4 in the rituximab group, where these meaningful improvements were also captured by video recordings. Interpretation: This is the largest controlled trial conducted in SPS patients and demonstrates no statistically significant difference in the efficacy measures between rituximab and placebo. Rituximab's lack of efficacy could be due to a considerable placebo effect; insensitivity of scales to quantify stiffness, especially in the less severely affected patients; or drug effectiveness in only a small patient subset. Ann Neurol 2017;82:271–277. © 2017 American Neurological Association
ER -