TY - JOUR TI - Fourth-line therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from the international mRCC database consortium (IMDC) AU - Stukalin, I. AU - Connor Wells, J. AU - Fraccon, A. AU - Pasini, F. AU - Porta, C. AU - Lalani, A.-K.A. AU - Srinivas, S. AU - Alex Bowman, I. AU - Brugarolas, J. AU - Lee, J.-L. AU - Donskov, F. AU - Beuselinck, B. AU - Bamias, A. AU - Rini, B.I. AU - Sim, H.-W. AU - Agarwal, N. AU - Rha, S.-Y. AU - Kanesvaran, R. AU - Choueiri, T.K. AU - Heng, D.Y.C. JO - Kidney Cancer PY - 2018 VL - 2 TODO - 1 SP - 31-36 PB - IOS Press BV SN - null TODO - 10.3233/KCA-170020 TODO - axitinib; pazopanib; sorafenib; sunitinib, adult; aged; Article; cancer prognosis; cancer survival; clinical outcome; cohort analysis; data base; female; high risk patient; human; intermediate risk patient; kidney metastasis; low risk patient; major clinical study; male; multicenter study (topic); overall survival; priority journal; progression free survival; retrospective study; treatment response TODO - Background: Fourth-line therapy (4LT) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) varies significantly due to the lack of data and recommendations to guide treatment decisions. Objective: To evaluate the use and efficacy of 4LT in mRCC patients. Methods: The International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) dataset was used to identify patients with mRCC treated with 4LT. This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients were evaluated for overall response. The six prognostic variables included in the IMDC prognostic model were used to stratify patients into favorable-, intermediate- and poor-risk groups. Exploratory analyses were performed examining the elderly (>70 years old) and non-clear cell RCC subgroups. Proportional hazards regression modelling was performed adjusting these covariates by IMDC criteria measured at initiation of 4th line therapy. Results: 7498 patients were treated with first line targeted therapy and out of these 594 (7.9%) received 4LT. Everolimus was the most frequently used 4LT (16.8%). Sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and clinical trial drugs were also used in >10% of patients. The OS of patients on any 4LT was 12.8 months, with a PFS of 4.4 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 13.7%. Favorable-risk patients using IMDC criteria (5%) displayed an OS of 23.1 months, intermediate-risk patients (66%) had an OS of 13.8 months and poor-risk patients (29%) had an OS of 7.8 (p < 0.0001) months. Age >70 years and non-clear cell histology did not impact OS. Our study is limited by its retrospective design. Conclusions: 4LT use appears to have activity in mRCC patients. The IMDC continues to be of prognostic value in the fourth-line setting for OS. This study helps to set a benchmark for response rate and survival for which clinical trials can plan sample size calculations and aim to improve upon. © 2018 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved ER -