TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability
using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in
pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis
AU - Levis, Brooke
AU - McMillan, Dean
AU - Sun, Ying
AU - He, Chen
AU - Rice,
AU - Danielle B.
AU - Krishnan, Ankur
AU - Wu, Yin
AU - Azar, Marleine and
AU - Sanchez, Tatiana A.
AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.
AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani
AU - and Neupane, Dipika
AU - Saadat, Nazanin
AU - Riehm, Kira E.
AU - Imran,
AU - Mahrukh
AU - Boruff, Jill T.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Gilbody, Simon and
AU - Ioannidis, John P. A.
AU - Kloda, Lorie A.
AU - Patten, Scott B. and
AU - Shrier, Ian
AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.
AU - Comeau, Liane
AU - Mitchell,
AU - Nicholas D.
AU - Tonelli, Marcello
AU - Vigod, Simone N.
AU - Aceti, Franca
AU - and Alvarado, Ruben
AU - Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme
AU - Bakare, Muideen O.
AU - and Barnes, Jacqueline
AU - Tatano Beck, Cheryl
AU - Bindt, Carola and
AU - Boyce, Philip M.
AU - Bunevicius, Adomas
AU - Castro e Couto, Tiago and
AU - Chaudron, Linda H.
AU - Correa, Humberto
AU - de Figueiredo, Felipe
AU - Pinheiro
AU - Eapen, Valsamma
AU - Fernandes, Michelle
AU - Figueiredo,
AU - Barbara
AU - Fisher, Jane R. W.
AU - Garcia-Esteve, Lluisa and
AU - Giardinelli, Lisa
AU - Helle, Nadine
AU - Howard, Louise M.
AU - Khalifa,
AU - Dina Sami
AU - Kohlhoff, Jane
AU - Kusminskas, Laima
AU - Kozinszky, Zoltan
AU - and Lelli, Lorenzo
AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A.
AU - Lewis, Beth A. and
AU - Maes, Michael
AU - Meuti, Valentina
AU - Rados, Sandra Nakic
AU - Navarro
AU - Garcia, Purificacion
AU - Nishi, Daisuke
AU - E-Andjafono, Daniel Okitundu
AU - Luwa
AU - Robertson-Blackmore, Emma
AU - Rochat, Tamsen J.
AU - Rowe,
AU - Heather J.
AU - Siu, Bonnie W. M.
AU - Skalkidou, Alkistis
AU - Stein, Alan
AU - and Stewart, Robert C.
AU - Su, Kuan-Pin
AU - Sundstroem-Poromaa, Inger
AU - and Tadinac, Meri
AU - Tandon, S. Darius
AU - Tendais, Iva
AU - Thiagayson,
AU - Pavaani
AU - Toereki, Annamaria
AU - Torres-Gimenez, Anna
AU - Tran, Thach
AU - D.
AU - Trevillion, Kylee
AU - Turner, Katherine
AU - Vega-Dienstmaier,
AU - Johann M.
AU - Wynter, Karen
AU - Yonkers, Kimberly A.
AU - Benedetti,
AU - Andrea
AU - Thombs, Brett D.
JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
PY - 2019
VL - 28
TODO - 4
SP - null
PB - Wiley
SN - 1049-8931, 1557-0657
TODO - 10.1002/mpr.1803
TODO - depressive disorders; diagnostic interviews; Edinburgh Postnatal
Depression Scale; individual participant data meta-analysis; major
depression
TODO - Objectives A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA)
identified differences in major depression classification rates between
different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on
the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine
whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using
studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
(EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods Data accrued for an EPDS
diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear
mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite
International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant
characteristics. Results Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15
studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified
depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194
major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95%
confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the
semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major
depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI
[0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92,
0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion Different
interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
ER -