@inproceedings{2968565, title = "The Historical Transition from the Young’s Double-slit Experiment to the Davisson-Germer Experiment, as Taught to Undergraduate Educators. The Educational Outcomes and Implications", author = "Aristotelis Gkiolmas and Artemisia Stoumpa and Constantine Skordoulis and Panagiotis Lazos and Anthimos Chalkidis", year = "2021", pages = "225-231", publisher = "Pisa University Press", booktitle = "40th Annual Conference of the Italian Society for The History of Physics and Astronomy (SISFA)", keywords = "Young experiment, Davisson–Germer experiment, Interference, History of Physics, Teaching, History of Physics.", abstract = "In the present work a teaching method is presented, concerning the way that a sample of undergraduate students is instructed about two basic experiments in the history of Physics: The Young’s double slit (interference) experiment and the Davisson–Germer experiment, which essentially proved that particles (electrons) do behave like waves (de Broglie hypothesis). The research question behind this research project is whether it is possible to teach students about the very important aspects of wave interference and wave properties of matter (Vokos et al., 2000), by avoiding mathematical formalism and difficult Physics’ concepts as much as possible. There have been similar efforts in the past, in the area of educational research (Baily, Filkenstein, 2010; Krijtenburg-Lewerissa et al., 2017), but these efforts usually refer to students with a good Physics and Mathematics’ background. The novelty here is that future educators – with weaknesses in Physics and with not an interest in Physics taken for granted – are addressed. Students watch both the experiments in front of them; they have some level of interaction with what is happening and are interviewed, in semi-structured research interviews about: (i) what they predict that will happen, (ii) what they see happening and (iii) what they learned about it (metaknowledge). The first experiment is executed both in its original form with water waves with laser-light, but also in the alternative form with laser light. The second experiment is executed through computer simulations (https://phet.colorado.edu and others) (McKagan et al., 2008) and animations. Prior to the interviews with the N=6 students, N΄ = 2 were interviewed on a pilot basis, in order to improve the interviews. Also, the N=6 students were given a pre-test and a post-test questionnaire, so as to measure what they learned from this teaching and experimental sequence.The results concerning the educational outcomes – given the limitations of the sample – are encouraging." }