Κατεύθυνση Αστικό Δίκαιο
Library of the School of Law

2019-02-20

2019

Anastasopoulos Georgios

Μιχαήλ Αυγουστιανάκης, Καθηγητής Αστικού Δικαίου, Νομική Σχολή, ΕΚΠΑ
Ευγενία Δακορώνια, Καθηγήτρια Αστικού Δικαίου, Νομική Σχολή, ΕΚΠΑ
Γεώργιος Μεντής, Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής Αστικού Δικαίου, Νομική Σχολή, ΕΚΠΑ

Η αντιφατική άσκηση δικαιώματος κατά το αγγλικό και το ελληνικό δίκαιο

Greek

Inconsistent excercise of rights in english and greek law

The present dissertation belongs to the field of comparative legal studies. Specifically, the analysis and comparative examination refer to the regulations of english and greek civil law dealing with the problem of inconsistent excersice of rights. In this context, english law involves the multifaceted principle (or doctrine) of estoppel, which seeks to prohibit inconsistency in daily transactions, while greek law contains the general clause of Article 281 Civil Code, which establishes objective criteria for assessing the exercise of rights. The comparison of estoppel, under its specific and applicable in this case form, ie promissory estoppel with the application of Article 281 Civil Code shows that, even though they belong to different legal families, the laws concerning us share some common features with notable being equity as a corrective legal mechanism originated by Aristotle.

Law and Legislation

inconsistency, right, estoppel, good faith, reliance

No

0

No

59

81

File access is restricted only to the intranet of UoA.

https://pergamos.lib.uoa.gr/uoa/dl/object/2857961