A survey of regional anesthesia use in greece and the impact of a structured regional anesthesia course on regional techniques knowledge and practice

Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού uoadl:3101797 94 Αναγνώσεις

Μονάδα:
Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ
Τίτλος:
A survey of regional anesthesia use in greece and the impact of a structured regional anesthesia course on regional techniques knowledge and practice
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Background: Due to the growing interest in regional anesthesia (RA) techniques and the realization of the need for formalized education in them, the Greek Chapter of the European Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA‐Hellas) has established a structured hands‐on training course held annually since 2009, which is quite popular in the community of Greek anesthesiologists. The aim of the current survey was twofold: first, to provide an overview of the current practice of RA in Greece; secondly, to evaluate the effect the aforementioned training course has on participants’ knowledge and attitude towards RA. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was uploaded on SurveyMonkey and a link giving access to the questionnaire was forwarded via email to a mailing list of 825 practicing Greek anesthesiologists held in the electronic database of ESRA Hellas. The survey was totally anonymous and no identifying information was collected throughout. It contained questions relating to the anesthesiologists’ demographic characteristics, their RA practice, and information pertaining to the RA training course. Results: A total of 424 fully completed questionnaires were received, representing an overall response rate of 51.4%. Attendants of the course are more familiar than non‐attendants with the performance of peripheral nerve blocks with neurostimulation and/or ultrasound guidance (p < 0.001). Attendants are also less likely to practice exclusively general anesthesia, more likely to use peripheral blocks for lower limb surgery, and more likely to consider taking the European Diploma of RA in comparison to non‐attendants (p < 0.001, p = 0.018 and p = 0.002, respectively). Both cohorts consider the course of value and agree that the main reason to use regional techniques is to ensure optimal postoperative analgesia, while the main hindrance to RA practice is the lack of relevant education in the techniques, especially those under ultrasound guidance. Regarding improvement of the course, most participants suggested devoting ampler time in hands‐on ultrasound practice and application. Conclusion: Greek anesthesiologists seek educational activities in the field of RA and the course seems to fulfil the majority of attendants’ expectations. There will be further effort by the organizers to improve weaknesses of the current course and undertake further educational initiatives in the field of RA according to international recommendations. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Έτος δημοσίευσης:
2021
Συγγραφείς:
Theodoraki, K.
Moka, E.
Makris, A.
Stavropoulou, E.
Περιοδικό:
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
Εκδότης:
MDPI
Τόμος:
10
Αριθμός / τεύχος:
21
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
adult; anesthesiologist; article; controlled study; demography; e-mail; education; expectation; female; general anesthesia; Greece; health survey; human; human experiment; lower limb; male; nerve block; nerve stimulation; overall response rate; postoperative analgesia; questionnaire; systematic review; ultrasound
Επίσημο URL (Εκδότης):
DOI:
10.3390/jcm10214814
Το ψηφιακό υλικό του τεκμηρίου δεν είναι διαθέσιμο.