Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ

Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders
classification: Systematic review and individual participant data
meta-analysis

Αγγλικά

Objectives Estimates of depression prevalence in pregnancy and
postpartum are based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
more than on any other method. We aimed to determine if any EPDS cutoff
can accurately and consistently estimate depression prevalence in
individual studies. Methods We analyzed datasets that compared EPDS
scores to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression
status. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare prevalence with
EPDS cutoffs versus the SCID. Results Seven thousand three hundred and
fifteen participants (1017 SCID major depression) from 29 primary
studies were included. For EPDS cutoffs used to estimate prevalence in
recent studies (>= 9 to >= 14), pooled prevalence estimates ranged from
27.8% (95% CI: 22.0%-34.5%) for EPDS >= 9 to 9.0% (95% CI:
6.8%-11.9%) for EPDS >= 14; pooled SCID major depression prevalence
was 9.0% (95% CI: 6.5%-12.3%). EPDS >= 14 provided pooled prevalence
closest to SCID-based prevalence but differed from SCID prevalence in
individual studies by a mean absolute difference of 5.1% (95%
prediction interval: -13.7%, 12.3%). Conclusion EPDS >= 14
approximated SCID-based prevalence overall, but considerable
heterogeneity in individual studies is a barrier to using it for
prevalence estimation.

2021

Lyubenova, Anita
Neupane, Dipika
Levis, Brooke
Wu, Yin and
Sun, Ying
He, Chen
Krishnan, Ankur
Bhandari, Parash M. and
Negeri, Zelalem
Imran, Mahrukh
Rice, Danielle B.
Azar,
Marleine
Chiovitti, Matthew J.
Saadat, Nazanin
Riehm, Kira
E.
Boruff, Jill T.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Cuijpers, Pim and
Gilbody, Simon
Kloda, Lorie A.
Patten, Scott B.
Shrier, Ian
and Ziegelstein, Roy C.
Comeau, Liane
Mitchell, Nicholas D. and
Tonelli, Marcello
Vigod, Simone N.
Aceti, Franca
Barnes,
Jacqueline
Bavle, Amar D.
Beck, Cheryl T.
Bindt, Carola and
Boyce, Philip M.
Bunevicius, Adomas
Chaudron, Linda H. and
Favez, Nicolas
Figueiredo, Barbara
Garcia-Esteve, Lluisa and
Giardinelli, Lisa
Helle, Nadine
Howard, Louise M.
Kohlhoff,
Jane
Kusminskas, Laima
Kozinszky, Zoltan
Lelli, Lorenzo and
Leonardou, Angeliki A.
Meuti, Valentina
Rados, Sandra N. and
Garcia, Purificacion N.
Pawlby, Susan J.
Quispel, Chantal and
Robertson-Blackmore, Emma
Rochat, Tamsen J.
Sharp, Deborah J.
and Siu, Bonnie W. M.
Stein, Alan
Stewart, Robert C. and
Tadinac, Meri
Tandon, S. Darius
Tendais, Iva
Toreki,
Annamaria
Torres-Gimenez, Anna
Tran, Thach D.
Trevillion,
Kylee
Turner, Katherine
Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M. and
Benedetti, Andrea
Thombs, Brett D.

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Wiley

30

1

depression prevalence; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; structured
clinical interview for DSM; individual participant data meta-analysis;
major depression

https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1860

10.1002/mpr.1860

https://pergamos.lib.uoa.gr/uoa/dl/object/3193061