ΠΜΣ Ελάχιστα Επεμβατική Χειρουργική, Ρομποτική Χειρουργική & Τηλεχειρουργική
Library of the School of Health Sciences

2017-07-06

2017

Kazakos Stylianos

Νικόλαος Νικητέας, Καθηγητής Χειρουργικής,Ιατρική, ΕΚΠΑ, Επιβλέπων
Ιωάννης Γκρινιάτσος, Αναπλ. Καθηγητής Χειρουργικής,Ιατρική, ΕΚΠΑ
Δημήτριος Δημητρούλης, Επίκ. Καθηγητής Χειρουργικής ,Ιατρική, ΕΚΠΑ

A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology

English

Μία σύγκριση ανάμεσα στην εξωπεριτοναϊκή και την ενδοπεριτοναϊκή λαπαροσκοπική ή ρομποτική λεμφαδενεκτομή στη γυναικολογική ογκολογία

Objective: The main aim of this study is to review the till now available literature data on the role of minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in gynecological cancers by comparing the extraperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus library yielded 31 papers published between 2009 and 2017, which considered conventional laparoscopic, single-port laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic trans- and extraperitoneal pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers.
Results: The experience and applications of Laparoscopic (conventional, single-port and robot-assisted) Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Outcomes were evaluated including age and BMI of patients, operative time, number of lymph nodes resected, hospital stay, estimated blood loss and complications (intra- and postoperative).
Conclusion: The extraperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches for laparoscopic and robotic aortic lymphadenectomy provide similar perioperative outcomes and nodal yields.

Health Sciences

Robotic, Laparoscopic, Retroperitoneal, Transperitoneal, Extraperitoneal, Lymphadenectomy

No

0

Yes

62

34

File access is restricted only to the intranet of UoA.

https://pergamos.lib.uoa.gr/uoa/dl/object/1707572