Unit:
Κατεύθυνση Πολιτική ΔικονομίαLibrary of the School of Law
Author:
Papastathis Andreas
Supervisors info:
Δημήτριος Τσικρικάς, Καθηγητής, Νομική Σχολή, Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Νικόλαος Μ. Κατηφόρης, Επίκουρος Καθηγητής, Νομική Σχολή, Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Ιωάννης ΣΤ. Δεληκωστόπουλος, Επίκουρος Καθηγητής, Νομική Σχολή, Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Δημήτριος Τσικρικάς, Καθηγητής, Νομική Σχολή, Εθνικό και Καποδιστριακό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών
Original Title:
Ο Αναιρετικός Έλεγχος της Αρχής της Αναλογικότητας
Translated title:
The Review before the Greek Supreme Court of the Principle of Proportionality
Summary:
This essay refers to the interpretation and understanding of the review before the Greek Supreme Court of the principle of proportionality and in its delimitation, in the light of the specialization of the indefinite legal concepts of the provisions of law and in particular about the reasonable pecuniary compensation for the moral damage (art. 932 of Greek Civil Code).The implications of this issue are related to the differentiation between legal and factual issues in the appeal proceedings, with the latter being unverified by the Greek Supreme Court. The analysis is based on the findings of the procedural theory and the jurisprudence. It consists of three main parts, the most notable being the one where the importance of the principle of proportionality is analyzed as an evaluative content of the reasonable pecuniary compensation of the moral damage. In conclusion, a critical review is attempted, along with the writer's standpoint, on the settled case law of the Greek Supreme Court, which recognizes that the reasonable pecuniary compensation for the moral damage is retractable, not directly as an indefinite legal concept, but only through reviewing the compliance with the principle of proportionality.
Main subject category:
Law and Legislation
Keywords:
Appeal, review before the Greek Supreme Court, Principle of Proportionality, indefinite legal concepts, reasonable pecuniary compensation , moral damage
Number of references:
111
