29. The Right to a Fair Hearing in the digital age: the power balance destabilised

30. Judicial doctrines and effectiveness of justice

31. Independence and impartiality of the Judiciary in the case law ofthe Romanian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights

32. Flirter avec la quatrième instance ? A propos de certains arrêts relatifs au droit à un procès équitable

33. Fair trial and search for truth in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights

34. Le dialogue judiciaire en matière des droits de l’homme

35. «Procès équitable» et «Etat de droit»: du standard à la norme dans la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne

36. The European Convention on Human Rights as a “Living Instrument” in the light of the principle of effectiveness

37. Faut-il faire le procès du procès équitable?

38. Right to a Fair Trial (Article 6 ECHR) in cases concerning sexual offences against children: how to balance the rights of the defence and those of victims?

39. Les réserves temporelles et les clauses de dénonciation aux déclarations facultatives de compétence de la Cour internationale de Justice et la bonne administration de la justice

40. Fair trial and due process: some convergences between european and american Jurisprudence on the example of the rights of defence

41. Challenges to the right of Fair Trial by the application of sharia law within the Council of Europe

42. The two dimensions of Judicial independence in the EU legal order

43. Some issues of the methodology of the ECtHR approach to the problem of jurisdiction of states

44. Victims of racist crime: how well are their procedural rights protected under the ECHR?

45. The unanswered question en contrepoint préjudiciel

46. The rule of law milestone: upholding judicial independence in the member states under Union Law

47. Droit international des droits de l’homme et entreprises militaires et de sécurité privées

48. Separation of powers and the right to a Fair Trial under Article 6 ECHR: empowering the Independence of the Judiciary in the subsidiarity epoch