Ways to get a more balanced gender representation in addiction journals’ management and workforce

Scientific publication - Journal Article uoadl:3336194 58 Read counter

Unit:
Department of Primary Education
Title:
Ways to get a more balanced gender representation in addiction journals’ management and workforce
Languages of Item:
English
Abstract:
Although the scientific community, particularly academic publishing, claims to be gender-neutral and based on meritocracy, it mirrors other parts of modern society, wherein residual gender imbalances and implicit and explicit gender biases are reproduced. In this report, we address gender imbalances (in particular, the overrepresentation of men) in the editorial workforce of academic journals as barriers to women's promotion and career progression in addiction science. We also consider potential gender-related elements and biases in the peer-review and editorial decision-making processes, which may result in women's lower publication rates, thereby creating another gender-related barrier to women's promotion, career progression and academic recognition. Establishing a more balanced gender representation in addiction publishing will require the adoption of the SAGER guidelines and the development of Gender Equality Plans for addiction specialty journals. Finally, although our focus concerns gender, the organisational mechanisms identified here also affect other types of heterogeneity and intersectional thinking.
Publication year:
2023
Authors:
Thomas Babor
Anna Tsiboukli
Matilda Hellman
Anees Bahji
Journal:
Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Publisher:
Sage
Volume:
1
Number:
1
Pages:
1-8
Keywords:
Gender, publications, drugs
Main subject category:
General works
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725231181440
References:
Ahmed, N. (2016). Addressing the Gender Workforce Gap in the Scientific Journal Editorial Hierarchy [Degree of Master of Public Health]. University of Connecticut.
Blewett, K., LaVecchia, C. M., Micciche, L. R. & Morris, J. (2019). Editing as inclusion activism. College English, 81(4), 273–296.
Burstin, H. R. & Arora, V. M. (2021). Gender dispar- ities in journal citations-another metric of inequity in academia. JAMA Network Open, 4(7),
Babor et al.
7
Hutchinson, D., Das, P., Lall, M. D., Hill, J., Fares, S. & Khosa, F. (2021). Emergency medicine journal editorial boards: Analysis of gender, H-Index, pub- lications, academic rank, and leadership roles. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(2), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.11. 49122
Jellinek Memorial Awards. (2022). Jellinek Memorial Fund: Award Winners. Jellinek Memorial Awards. https://jellinekaward.org/award-winners
König, T. & Ropers, G. (2018). Gender and editorial outcomes at the American political science review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 849–853. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000604
Kumashiro, K. K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti- oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1170593
MacNell, L., Driscoll, A. & Hunt, A. N. (2015). What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10755-014-9313-4
Mauleón, E., Hillán, L., Moreno, L., Gómez, I. & Bordons, M. (2013). Assessing gender balance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics, 95(1), 87–114. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0824-4
Metz, I., Harzing, A.-W. & Zyphur, M. J. (2016). Of journal editors and editorial boards: Who are the trailblazers in increasing editorial board gender equality? British Journal of Management, 27(4), 712–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8551.12133
Nedal, D. K. & Nexon, D. H. (2018). Gender in the international studies quarterly review process. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 859–865. https://doi.org/10.1017/S10490965180 00628
Østby, G., Strand, H., Nordås, R. & Gleditsch, N. (2013). Gender gap or gender bias in peace research? Publication patterns and citation rates for journal of peace research, 1983–2008. International Studies Perspectives, 14, 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12025
Peters, S. A. E., Babor, T. F., Norton, R. N., Clayton, J. A., Ovseiko, P. V., Tannenbaum, C. & Heidari, S. (2021).
Fifth anniversary of the sex and gender equity in research (SAGER) guidelines: Taking stock and looking ahead. BMJ Global Health, 6(11), e007853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007853
Peterson, D. (2018). Author gender and editorial out- comes at political behavior. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S104909651800063X
Rhoads, R. A. & Gu, D. Y. (2012). A gendered point of view on the challenges of women academics in The People’s Republic of China. Higher Education, 63, 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10734-011-9474-3
Samuels, D. (2018). Gender and editorial outcomes at comparative political studies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 854–858. https://doi. org/10.1017/S1049096518000616
Teele, D. L. & Thelen, K. (2017). Gender in the jour- nals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002985
The Society for the Study of Addiction. (2018, May 23). A Celebration of Women in Addiction [Academic]. SSA. https://www.addiction-ssa.org/ a-celebration-of-women-in-addiction/
Trix, F. & Psenka, C. (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 14(2), 191–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926 503014002277
Tudor, C. L. & Yashar, D. J. (2018). Gender and the editorial process: World politics, 2007–2017. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000641
Upthegrove, R., Cates, A., de Shuttleworth, A., Tracy, D. K., Broome, M. R. & Lingford-Hughes, A. (2021). Gender equality in academic publishing: Action from the BJPsych. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 218(3), 128– 130. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.192
van den Brink, M. & Benschop, Y. (2011). Gender prac- tices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507– 524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293
Van Epps, H., Astudillo, O., Martin, Y. D. P. & Marsh, J. (2022). The sex and gender equity in research (SAGER) guidelines: Implementation and checklist

8
Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 0(0)
development. European Science Editing, 48,
e86910. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e86910 Willis, M., Bridges, A. J. & Jozkowski, K. N. (2021). Gender and racial/ethnic disparities in rates of
publishing and inclusion in scientific-review pro- cesses. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(4), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/ tps0000253
The digital material of the item is not available.