Summary:
The arrangement of working conditions based on the current legal framework is the essence of the topic of this thesis. In particular, it aims to investigate and analyze the labor dispute settlement system, which consists of three successive stages. These are, in turn, reconciliation, mediation and arbitration. Recourse to the former presupposes the failure of direct negotiations between the two parties or their non-conduct. Furthermore, in general, recourse to mediation follows the failure of the reconciliation stage, while the recourse to arbitration the failed conclusion of the second stage, that of mediation. In this context, "arbitration is one of the main ways of resolving labor disputes". However, the issue, especially with regard to recourse to arbitration, on a case-by-case basis, is clearly proving to be more complex. This, moreover, is one of the elements that make it particularly interesting to investigate it, especially after a decade of upheaval constantly on the legal framework on labor relations and the reduction in the parallel social, political and economic developments. Moreover, this logic permeates the legislation and the Constitution in general is a key starting point for the functioning of labor law. In addition, this interest becomes greater given the individual issues related to the possibilities of recourse to arbitration.
