Anti-tumour activity of everolimus and sunitinib in neuroendocrine neoplasms

Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού uoadl:3078450 82 Αναγνώσεις

Μονάδα:
Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ
Τίτλος:
Anti-tumour activity of everolimus and sunitinib in neuroendocrine neoplasms
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Comparisons between everolimus and sunitinib regarding their efficacy and safety in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are scarce. We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in 92 patients with well-differentiated (WD) NEN of different origin (57 pancreatic NENs (PanNENs)), treated with molecular targeted therapy (MTT) with everolimus or sunitinib, first-(73:19) or second-line (sequential; 12:22) for progressive disease. Disease control rates (DCR: partial response or stable disease) at first-line were higher in all patients treated with everolimus than sunitinib (64/73 vs 12/19, P = 0.012). In PanNENs, DCR at first-line everolimus was 36/42 versus 9/15 with sunitinib (P = 0.062). Progression-free survival (PFS) at first-line everolimus was longer than sunitinib (31 months (95% CI: 23.1–38.9) vs 9 months (95% CI: 0–18.5); log-rank P < 0.0001) in the whole cohort and the subset of PanNENs (log-rank P < 0.0001). Median PFS at second-line MTT was 12 months with everolimus (95% CI: 4.1–19.9) vs 13 months with sunitinib (95% CI: 9.3–16.7; log-rank P = 0.951). Treatment with sunitinib (HR: 3.47; 95% CI: 1.5–8.3; P value: 0.005), KI67 >20% (HR: 6.38; 95% CI: 1.3–31.3; P = 0.022) and prior chemotherapy (HR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.2–6.3; P = 0.021) were negative predictors for PFS at first line in multivariable and also confirmed at multi-state modelling analyses. Side effect (SE) analysis indicated events of serious toxicities (Grades 3 and 4: n = 13/85 for everolimus and n = 4/41 for sunitinib). Discontinuation rate due to SEs was 20/85 for everolimus versus 4/41 for sunitinib (P = 0.065). No additive toxicity of second-line MTT was confirmed. Based on these findings, and until reliable predictors of response become available, everolimus may be preferable to sunitinib when initiating MTT in progressive NENs. © 2019 The authors Published by Bioscientifica Ltd.
Έτος δημοσίευσης:
2019
Συγγραφείς:
Daskalakis, K.
Tsoli, M.
Angelousi, A.
Kassi, E.
Alexandraki, K.I.
Kolomodi, D.
Kaltsas, G.
Koumarianou, A.
Περιοδικό:
Endocrine Connections
Εκδότης:
BioScientifica Ltd
Τόμος:
8
Αριθμός / τεύχος:
6
Σελίδες:
641-653
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
everolimus; fluorodeoxyglucose f 18; gallium 68; Ki 67 antigen; pentetreotide; pertechnetic acid tc 99m; somatostatin; somatostatin receptor; sunitinib, abdominal pain; acute diarrhea; adult; antineoplastic activity; Article; cancer chemotherapy; cancer grading; cancer growth; cancer mortality; cell differentiation; Charlson Comorbidity Index; disease exacerbation; drug efficacy; drug safety; fatigue; female; gastrointestinal symptom; human; labeling index; major clinical study; male; molecularly targeted therapy; multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; nausea; neuroendocrine tumor; positron emission tomography-computed tomography; priority journal; progression free survival; retrospective study; treatment duration; vomiting
Επίσημο URL (Εκδότης):
DOI:
10.1530/EC-19-0134
Το ψηφιακό υλικό του τεκμηρίου δεν είναι διαθέσιμο.