Τίτλος:
Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Objectives: Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs) play an increasingly important role in managing cancer patients from diagnosis to treatment. However, many problems arise around the organisation of MTBs, both in terms of organisation-administration and time management. In this context, the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) conducted a survey among its members, aimed at assessing the quality and amount of involvement of radiologists in MTBs, their role in it and related issues. Methods: All members were invited to fill in a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions with both open and multiple-choice answers. Simple descriptive analyses and graphs were performed. Results: A total of 292 ESOI members in full standing for the year 2018 joined the survey. Most respondents (89%) declared to attend MT-Bs, but only 114 respondents (43.9%) review over 70% of exams prior to MTB meetings, mainly due to lack of time due to a busy schedule for imaging and reporting (46.6%). Perceived benefits (i.e. surgical and histological feedback (86.9%), improved knowledge of cancer treatment (82.7%) and better interaction between radiologists and referring clinicians for discussing rare cases (56.9%)) and issues (i.e. attending MTB meetings during regular working hours (71.9%) and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education (CME) (85%)) are reported. Conclusions: Despite the value and benefits of radiologists’ participation in MTBs, issues like improper preparation due to a busy schedule and no counterpart in CME accreditation require efforts to improve the role of radiologists for a better patient care. Key Points: • Most radiologists attend multidisciplinary tumour boards, but less than half of them review images in advance, mostly due to time constraints. • Feedback about radiological diagnoses, improved knowledge of cancer treatment and interaction with referring clinicians are perceived as major benefits. • Concerns were expressed about scheduling multidisciplinary tumour boards during regular working hours and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education. © 2020, The Author(s).
Συγγραφείς:
Neri, E.
Gabelloni, M.
Bäuerle, T.
Beets-Tan, R.
Caruso, D.
D’Anastasi, M.
Dinkel, J.
Fournier, L.S.
Gourtsoyianni, S.
Hoffmann, R.-T.
Mayerhöfer, M.E.
Regge, D.
Schlemmer, H.P.
Laghi, A.
Περιοδικό:
European Radiology
Εκδότης:
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
accreditation; adult; article; cancer surgery; cancer therapy; controlled study; female; histology; histopathology; human; interdisciplinary communication; major clinical study; male; medical education; multidisciplinary team; patient care; questionnaire; radiodiagnosis; radiologist; diagnostic imaging; neoplasm; oncology; questionnaire; radiologist, Humans; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; Patient Care Team; Radiologists; Surveys and Questionnaires
DOI:
10.1007/s00330-020-07178-w
