Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel

Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού uoadl:3120669 25 Αναγνώσεις

Μονάδα:
Ερευνητικό υλικό ΕΚΠΑ
Τίτλος:
Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Background: Prompt diagnosis and treatment of paediatric urolithiasis are required to avoid long term sequelae of renal damage. Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding the diagnostic imaging modalities and treatment approaches for paediatric urolithiasis. Study design: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1980–January 2019. 76 full-text articles were included. Results: Ultrasound and Kidney-Ureter-Bladder radiography are the baseline diagnostic examinations. Non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) is the second line choice with high sensitivity (97–100%) and specificity (96–100%). Magnetic Resonance Urography accounts only for 2% of pediatric stone imaging studies. Expectant management for single, asymptomatic lower pole renal stones is an acceptable initial approach, especially in patients with non-struvite, non-cystine stones<7 mm. Limited studies exist on medical expulsive therapy as off-label treatment. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the first-line treatment with overall stone free rates (SFRs) of 70–90%, retreatment rates 4–50% and complication rates up to 15%. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy is effective with SFRs of 81–98%, re-treatment rates of 6.3–10% and complication rates of 1.9–23%. Flexible ureteroscopy has shown SFRs of 76–100%, retreatment rates of 0–19% and complication rates of 0–28%. SFRs after first and second-look percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) are 70.1–97.3% and 84.6–97.5%, respectively with an overall complication rate of 20%. Open surgery is seldom used, while laparoscopy is effective for stones refractory to SWL and PNL. Limited data exist for robot-assisted management. Conclusions: In the initial assessment of paediatric urolithiasis, US is recommended as first imaging modality, while non-contrast CT is the second option. SWL is recommended as first line treatment for renal stones <20 mm and for ureteral stones<10 mm. Ureteroscopy is a feasible alternative both for ureteral stones not amenable to SWL as well as for renal stones <20 mm (using flexible). PNL is recommended for renal stones >20 mm. © 2020 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company
Έτος δημοσίευσης:
2020
Συγγραφείς:
Grivas, N.
Thomas, K.
Drake, T.
Donaldson, J.
Neisius, A.
Petřík, A.
Ruhayel, Y.
Seitz, C.
Türk, C.
Skolarikos, A.
Περιοδικό:
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Εκδότης:
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Τόμος:
16
Αριθμός / τεύχος:
5
Σελίδες:
612-624
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
doxazosin; gadolinium; tamsulosin, child; cystography; diagnostic imaging; extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; female; human; laparoscopic surgery; male; nephrolithiasis; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; open surgery; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; practice guideline; preschool child; priority journal; renography; retreatment; Review; school child; sensitivity and specificity; systematic review; ureteroscopy; urography; urolithiasis
Επίσημο URL (Εκδότης):
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.003
Το ψηφιακό υλικό του τεκμηρίου δεν είναι διαθέσιμο.