Τίτλος:
Revascularization of radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy vs. carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Objective: The incidence of carotid artery stenosis after head and neck radiation is anticipated to rise due to the increasing survival of patients with head and neck malignancies. It remains unclear whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) is the best treatment strategy for radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis. Materials & methods: This study was performed according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central until July 20, 2017. A meta-analysis of random effects model was conducted. The I-square statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. Results: Five studies and 143 patients were included. Periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death rates were similar between the two revascularization approaches. However, the risk for cranial nerve (CN) injury was higher in the CEA group (OR: 7.09; 95% CI: 1.17–42.88; I2 = 0%). CEA was associated with lower mortality rates after a mean follow-up of 50 months (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09–0.97; I2 = 0%). No difference was identified in long-term restenosis rates between CEA and CAS. Conclusions: Patients with radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis can safely undergo both CAS and CEA with similar risks of periprocedural stroke, MI and death. However, patients treated with CEA have a higher risk for periprocedural CN injuries and a lower risk for long-term mortality. © 2018
Συγγραφείς:
Giannopoulos, S.
Texakalidis, P.
Jonnalagadda, A.K.
Karasavvidis, T.
Giannopoulos, S.
Kokkinidis, D.G.
Περιοδικό:
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Εκδότης:
HANLEY & BELFUS-ELSEVIER INC
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
all cause mortality; carotid artery obstruction; carotid artery stenting; carotid endarterectomy; cranial nerve injury; follow up; human; meta analysis; priority journal; radiation injury; revascularization; Review; systematic review; aged; carotid artery obstruction; devices; diagnostic imaging; endovascular surgery; female; head and neck tumor; male; middle aged; mortality; postoperative complication; radiation injury; risk assessment; risk factor; stent; treatment outcome, Aged; Carotid Stenosis; Endarterectomy, Carotid; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Radiation Injuries; Radiotherapy; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Treatment Outcome
DOI:
10.1016/j.carrev.2018.01.014
