Interactive Multimedia Environment Intervention with Learning Anxiety and Metacognition as Achievement Predictors

Επιστημονική δημοσίευση - Άρθρο Περιοδικού uoadl:3452410 6 Αναγνώσεις

Μονάδα:
Τμήμα Ιατρικής
Τίτλος:
Interactive Multimedia Environment Intervention with Learning Anxiety and Metacognition as Achievement Predictors
Γλώσσες Τεκμηρίου:
Αγγλικά
Περίληψη:
Background: Interactive learning environments have emerged as transformative tools in education, enhancing engagement, academic performance, and addressing challenges like learning anxiety. This study examines the influence of multiple variables, including anxiety, internet usage for problem-solving, attitude towards a history course, metacognitive awareness, and interactive learning environments, on seventh-grade students’ academic performance. Methods: Using the Exploration of Attitudes Towards History Scale (EDIS) scale to measure attitudes and the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory-Revised Two-Factor Version (MARSI-2fR) to assess metacognitive awareness, the study evaluated historical knowledge across three stages, namely pre-intervention, post-intervention, and a one-month-later retest. A comparative analysis was conducted between the control group and the intervention group. The statistical analyses involved the calculation of correlation coefficients, the implementation of general linear models, and the performance of Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: The findings indicated that prior to the intervention, factors such as learning anxiety and the extratextual component of metacognition were statistically significant predictors of achievement. However, the aforementioned factors ceased to be statistically significant when the parameter of study strategies was incorporated into the statistical model. The impact of the interactive learning environment on students’ achievement is highly statistically significant in terms of post-test scores, while the influence of all other predictors becomes insignificant. The retest confirmed the continued maintenance of the achieved results as evaluated following the intervention. Conclusions: The study confirms previous research demonstrating that interactive learning environments are an effective method of enhancing students’ academic performance and reducing the negative impact of learning anxiety.
Έτος δημοσίευσης:
2025
Συγγραφείς:
Aristea Mavrogianni
Eleni Vasilaki
Michalis Linardakis
Aikaterini Vasiou
Konstantinos Mastrothanasis
Περιοδικό:
Psychology International
Εκδότης:
MDPI
Τόμος:
7
Αριθμός / τεύχος:
1
Σελίδες:
xx
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
anxiety, extratextual strategies, interactive learning environments, metacognition
Κύρια θεματική κατηγορία:
Εκπαίδευση – Αθλητισμός
Επίσημο URL (Εκδότης):
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7010002
Αναφορές:
Anagnostopoulou, K., Hatzinikita, V., Christidou, V., & Dimopoulos, K. (2013). PISA Test Items and School-Based Examinations in Greece: Exploring the relationship between global and local assessment discourses. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 636–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604801
Asma, H., & Dallel, S. (2020). Cognitive Load Theory and its Relation to Instructional Design: Perspectives of Some Algerian University Teachers of English. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8
Berutu, R., & Mutiawati, M. (2023). Understanding learning anxiety and mental health of final year students: A qualitative study. ProGCouns: Journal of Professionals in Guidance and Counseling, 4(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/progcouns.v4i1.60000
Birsyada, M. I., Fahruddin, & Fairuzabadi, M. (2023). The Development of History Learning Media with Gis Web Based in Improving Real Understanding of Senior High School Students. Proceedings of the 1st UPY International Conference on Education and Social Science (UPINCESS 2022), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-39-8_35
Blannin, J., & Kung, V. (2023). Transforming Practices in ILEs. In J. Morris & W. Imms (Eds.), Teachers as Researchers in Innovative Learning Environments (pp. 59–73). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7367-5_5
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cassady, J. C. (2022). Anxiety in the Schools: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions for Academic Anxieties. In L. R. V. Gonzaga, L. L. Dellazzana-Zanon, & A. M. Becker da Silva (Eds.), Handbook of Stress and Academic Anxiety (pp. 13–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12737-3_2
Chouchene, A. M. (2019). Historical research in the digital age: opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 6(2), 73–83.
Dumitru, C., Stan, M. M., & Dumitru, G. (2024). Academic support through tutoring, guided learning, and learning diaries in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: an experimental model for master’s students. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1256960
Egiebor, E. E., & Foster, E. J. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Their Engagement Using GIS-Story Maps. Journal of Geography, 118(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2018.1515975
El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Faisal, R. A., Jobe, M. C., Ahmed, O., & Sharker, T. (2022). Mental Health Status, Anxiety, and Depression Levels of Bangladeshi University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(3), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00458-y
Fooladvand, M. (2017). The effect of cognitive and metacognitive strategies in academic achievement: A systematic review. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v3i1.1780
French, R., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2020). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, 23(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219894408
Huntington, B., Goulding, J., & Pitchford, N. J. (2023). Expert perspectives on how educational technology may support autonomous learning for remote out-of-school children in low-income contexts. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100263
Huntley, C. D., Young, B., Smith, C. T., Jha, V., & Fisher, P. L. (2022). Assessing metacognitive beliefs in test anxiety: Psychometric properties of the metacognitions questionnaire, 30 (MCQ-30) among university students. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00662-y
Katsarou, E. (2009). A Multiliteracy Intervention in a Contemporary “Mono-Literacy” School in Greece. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 16(5), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i05/46285
Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraichi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students’ engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7033–7055. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10566-4/FIGURES/2
Koulianou, M., Roussos, P., & Samartzi, S. (2019). Metacognitive reading strategies: Greek adaptation of the MARSI-(GR) and a comparative study of adolescent students with and without special learning difficulties. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 24(1), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.22391
Kyriakidis, A., Zervoudakis, K., Krassadaki, E., & Tsafarakis, S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of ICT on Higher Education Teaching During COVID-19: Identifying Barriers and Opportunities Through Advanced Text Analysis on Instructors’ Experiences. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02346-5
Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical Metacognition on Word Problem Solving in Children with and without Mathematical Learning Difficulties. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0130570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130570
Linardakis, M. (2023). On Teachers’ Perceptions of Development of Expertise from the Experience of Distance Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(5), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.5.749
Lo, J.-J., Chang, C.-J., Tu, H.-H., & Yeh, S.-W. (2009). Applying GIS to develop a web-based spatial-person-temporal history educational system. Computers & Education, 53(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.016
Malysheva, O., Tokareva, E., Orchakova, L., & Smirnova, Y. (2022). The effect of online learning in modern history education. Heliyon, 8(7), e09965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09965
Martí-Henneberg, J. (2011). Geographical Information Systems and the Study of History. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 42(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/JINH_a_00202
Mastrothanasis, K., Geladari, A., & Kladaki, M. (2018). Play activities in second language teaching metacognitive writing strategies to struggling bilingual writers: an empirical study. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(6), 279–290.
Mastrothanasis, K., Koulianou, M., Katsifi, S., & Zouganeli, A. (2018). The use of Metacognitive knowledge and regulation strategies’ of students with and without special learning difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 191–207.
Mastrothanasis, K., Zervoudakis, K., Kladaki, M., & Tsafarakis, S. (2023). A bio-inspired computational classifier system for the evaluation of children’s theatrical anxiety at school. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11027–11050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11645-4
Mavrogianni, A., Vasilaki, E., & Giahnakis, E. (2021). Construction and psychometric testing of a scale to investigate students’ attitudes towards history. Preschool and Primary Education, 9(2), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.12681/ppej.25991
Mavrogianni, A., Vasilaki, E., Spantidakis, I., & Chourdakis, A. (2023). Attitude towards History and interactive learning environments. Education Sciences, 2023(3), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.26248/edusci.v2023i3.1731
Mavrogianni, A., Vasilaki, E., Spantidakis, I., & Giahnakis, E. (2023a). Pedagogical agents as a fading scaffolding tool for developing metacognitive strategies. Dialogoi! Theory and Praxis in Education, 9, 90–114. https://doi.org/10.12681/dial.36288
Mavrogianni, A., Vasilaki, E., Spantidakis, I., & Giahnakis, E. (2023b). Standardization and psychometric properties of the revised Metacognitive Awareness Reading Strategies Inventory MARSI-2fR. Themes in Education Sciences, 2(2), 42–66. https://doi.org/10.12681/thea.33822
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Molina Roldán, S., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427
Msafiri, M. M., Kangwa, D., & Cai, L. (2023). A systematic literature review of ICT integration in secondary education: what works, what does not, and what next? Discover Education, 2(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00070-x
Müller, A. M., Röpke, R., Konert, J., & Bellhäuser, H. (2024). Investigating group formation: An experiment on the distribution of extraversion in educational settings. Acta Psychologica, 242, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104111
Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Bono, R. (2019). Academic anxieties: which type contributes the most to low achievement in methodological courses? Educational Psychology, 39(6), 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1582756
Poitras, E., Lajoie, S., & Hong, Y.-J. (2012). The design of technology-rich learning environments as metacognitive tools in history education. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1033–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9194-1
Raave, D. K., Saks, K., Pedaste, M., & Roldan Roa, E. (2024). How and Why Teachers Use Technology: Distinct Integration Practices in K-12 Education. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121301
Reiser, B. J. (2018). Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work. In E. Davis & N. Miyake (Eds.), Scaffolding (pp. 273–304). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764411-2
Ryum, T., Kennair, L. E. O., Hjemdal, O., Hagen, R., Halvorsen, J. Ø., & Solem, S. (2017). Worry and Metacognitions as Predictors of Anxiety Symptoms: A Prospective Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00924
Silaj, K. M., Schwartz, S. T., Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Test Anxiety and Metacognitive Performance in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1809–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09598-6
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Toktamysov, S., Alwaely, S. A., & Gallyamova, Z. (2023). Digital technologies in history training: the impact on students` academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2173–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11210-5
Tsivas, A. (2011). Pedagogical use of ICT in history education: Theoretical and research scenarios and approaches. Issues in Science and Technology Education, 4(1–3), 151–164.
Ugalde, L., Santiago-Garabieta, M., Villarejo-Carballido, B., & Puigvert, L. (2021). Impact of Interactive Learning Environments on Learning and Cognitive Development of Children With Special Educational Needs: A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674033
Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., Mytton, O., Bonell, C., & Booy, R. (2020). School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, 4(5), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X
Wang, L., & Macintyre, P. (2021). Second language listening comprehension: The role of anxiety and enjoyment in listening metacognitive awareness. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.2
Wells, A. (2006). The Metacognitive Model of Worry and Generalised Anxiety Disorder. In G. S. L. Davey & A. Wells (Eds.), Worry and its Psychological Disorders (pp. 177–199). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713143.ch11
Wells, A. (2019). Breaking the Cybernetic Code: Understanding and Treating the Human Metacognitive Control System to Enhance Mental Health. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02621
Xue, S., & Crompton, H. (2024). Educational technology research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2022-0067
Zepeda, C. D., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2021). Metacognitive study strategies in a college course and their relation to exam performance. Memory & Cognition, 49(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01106-5
Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, F. (2020). 'School’s Out, But Class’ On’, The Largest Online Education in the World Today: Taking China’s Practical Exploration During The COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control As an Example. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3555520
Zinbarg, R. E., Williams, A. L., & Mineka, S. (2022). A Current Learning Theory Approach to the Etiology and Course of Anxiety and Related Disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 18(1), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072220-021010
psycholint-07-00002.pdf (259 KB) Άνοιγμα σε νέο παράθυρο